MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969126879 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6184397

Hydraena

2011· article· en· W6969126879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrous jointApex (geometry)RidgeDorsumCommissure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to Groups of New World Hydraena 1 Posterior ridge of genae present, at least laterally (e.g., Figs. 2 c, 2d); abdominal intercoxal ventrite various; scintilla absent ... 2 1' Posterior ridge of genae absent (e.g., Figs. 44, 126) or nearly imperceptible; abdominal intercoxal ventrite flat, with posterior margin straight or weakly arcuate; scintilla (Fig. 2 b) present or absent........................................... 5 2 Elytra and labrum with spines (Figs. 21, 22); elytron with five rows of punctures between suture and humerous; two species from South America ...................................................................... Multispina Group 2' Elytra and labrum without spines; elytron with more than five rows, or with many random punctures................... 3 3 Abdominal intercoxal ventrite concave, with posterior margin markedly arcuate; elytral punctures serial or, in few adults, with few random punctures on disc; spermatheca C-shaped; female gonocoxite not divided; Canada and the United States ............................................................................................... Circulata Group 3' Abdominal intercoxal ventrite flat, with posterior margin straight or weakly arcuate; elytral punctures random, at least near base; spermatheca disc-shaped (e.g. Figs. 151–154) or (in H. paeminosa) trilobed (Fig. 155); female gonocoxite divided (Figs. 148–150); South America .............................................................................. 4 4. Elytral punctures coarse and very random (e.g., Fig. 3); pronotum more elongate; mesoventral intercoxal process (P2) very narrow, tapering to sharp point that is contiguous with midlongitudinal carina of metaventrite (e.g., Fig. 2 c).................................................................................................... Paeminosa Group 4'. Elytral punctures serial except in small area at base (Figs. 16–18); pronotum less elongate, sides more sinuate; mesoventral intercoxal process (P2) wide, apex blunt (e.g., Fig. 2 d)............................................ Curvosa Group 5 Pronotal scintilla (Fig. 2 b) present or absent; pronotum always with posteromedial foveae (PF2; Fig. 2 a)...... Leechi Group 5' Pronotum never with scintilla; pronotum without posteromedial foveae, or if present very shallow and pronotum coarsely punctate (e.g., Figs. 110, 118)........................................................... Marginicollis Group

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207