Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) surianae (Mitchell 1960) Figs 67–69 Dialictus surianae Mitchell, 1960: 420 (holotype, ♀, deposited in FSCA, examined). Lasioglossum (Dialictus) surianae – Krombein 1967: 466 (catalogue). — Gibbs 2011: 26, 32 (key to species), 185 (redescription). Dialictus surianae – Hurd 1979: 1972 (catalogue). — Moure & Hurd 1987; 132 (catalogue). Diagnosis Females of L. surianae have the tegula very small (maximum length less than half ITS and not reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view) with inner posterior margin straight, translucent yellow, and very finely, sparsely punctate (IS = 2–6 PD); mesepisternum shiny and densely punctate (IS <1 PD); postgena dull with lineolate microsculpture; frons shiny with distinct (but still very narrow) interspaces between punctures; and metasoma red-orange with terga reddish brown at base. The tegula punctures are so fine that at low magnification or at certain angles, they may not be visible and the tegula will appear impunctate. Females of L. surianae are most similar to those of L. deludens sp. nov., L. diabolicum sp. nov., and L. rufodeludens sp. nov. Females of L. deludens and L. rufodeludens have the tegula impunctate except on extreme anterior margin and postgena smooth and shiny. In addition, females of L. deludens have the metasoma black to brown (sometimes slightly reddish on apical rims), and females of L. rufodeludens have the mesepisternum dull. Females of L. diabolicum have the frons dull and reticulate with no distinct interspaces between punctures. Males of L. surianae have the tegula small (as in the female), face with tomentum limited to lower paraocular area, and mesepisternum shiny and densely punctate (IS ≤ 1 PD). The only male specimen available for study was missing the metasoma, so additional diagnostic characters on the metasoma may exist. Males of L. surianae are most similar to those of L. deludens sp. nov., L. diabolicum sp. nov., L. rufodeludens sp. nov., and L. perparvum, all of which (except L. perparvum) have the face entirely covered with dense tomentum below the eye emargination. In addition, males of L. deludens and L. rufodeludens have the tegula impunctate except on extreme anterior margin. Males of L. perparvum have the clypeus with some sparse tomentum and tegula usually dark brown. Etymology Mitchell (1960) named this species after the plant Suriana maritima L., one of its hosts. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Florida • ♀; Plantation Key; [24.985° N, 80.546° W]; 27 Nov. 1955; H.V. Weems Jr. leg.; FCSA. Other material BAHAMAS • 2 ♀♀; Great Exuma, Georgetown N., Island #26; 23.5° N, 75.75° W; 8 Aug. 2004; M.F. Keller leg.; PCYU • 1 ♂; Gorda Cay; 26.0833° N, 77.5333° W; 26 Jun.–7 Jul. 1998; T. Peak leg.; UCFC • 1 ♀; ibid.; 7–16 Jul. 1998; T. Peak leg.; UCFC. UNITED STATES – Florida • 1 ♀; Key Vaca; [24.76° N, 80.96° W]; 28 Dec. 1955; H. V. Weems Jr. leg.; CUIC • 1 ♀; Monroe Co., Stock Island; [24.57° N, 81.74° W]; 15 Oct. 1963; H. V. Weems Jr. leg.; CUIC • 1 ♀; Monroe Co., Big Pine Key; [24.69° N, 81.37° W]; 23 Jun. 1971; W.H. Pierce leg.; CUIC • 1 ♂; ibid.; 19 May 1971; W.H. Pierce leg.; CUIC. Range Florida and Bahamas (Fig. 69). Floral hosts (from Mitchell 1960 and Gibbs 2011) ASTERACEAE: Bidens: B. pilosa • CONVOLVULACEAE: Jacquemontia Choisy • SURIANACEAE Arn.: Suriana L.: S. maritima L. DNA barcodes One confirmed sequence available (BOLD process ID: BEECB173-07). It is closest in terms of p-distance to L. pseudotegulare (4.29% minimum interspecific p-distance). Nine fixed nucleotide substitutions distinguish L. surianae from all other Nearctic species of the L. gemmatum complex: 15(A), 105(C), 123(C), 276(C), 288(G), 358(C), 399(C), 420(T), and 564(T) (Supp. file 2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".