Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Pseudoparaclius Grichanov Pseudoparaclius Grichanov, 2006: 29. Type-species, Pelastoneurus brincki Vanschuytbroeck, 1960, by original designation. Diagnosis. Pseudoparaclius is morphologically similar to Afroparaclius (Grichanov, 2006), both belonging to the Tachytrechus Haliday genus-group sensu Brooks (2005). Wing vein M1+2 is convex posteriad and is convergent towards R4+5 from middle of distal part. M1+2 join Costa well before the wing tip (Fig. 1 B). Stylus positioned almost mid-dorsally on postpedicel, with short pubescence. Metepimeron usually with cluster of setae on posterior margin. Male fore or mid legs often modified (apomorphy). Epandrium large, trapezoidal, characterized by possession of 1–2 finely branched setae on apicoventral epandrial lobe (rarely present in the subfamily). Postgonite narrow, usually as long as the longest lobe of surstylus. Cercus well developed. Proctiger brush absent. Remarks. The genus Pseudoparaclius consists of 15 described and named species (including the current addition), which are all Afrotropical [see Grichanov (2006) for a catalogue of included species], but a number of Oriental species currently placed in Paraclius Loew appear to be sharing the relevant diagnostic characters (Brooks 2005; Yang et al. 2011) and may eventually prove to belong in Pseudoparaclius. Also, material from the eastern Palaearctic (Japan) as well as from Australia [in the Canadian National Insect Collection, Ottawa] appears to represent additional species of this genus (S. Brooks, pers. comm. 2015), indicating a much wider distribution. The species of this genus were separated from the genus Paracleius Bigot (a suppressed senior synonym of Pelastoneurus Loew) by Grichanov (2006), and we are here providing a key specifically for the Afrotropical species of Pseudoparaclius.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".