Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dacninae Nova Scotia NS NB PE Dacninae Dacne quadrimaculata (Say) 1 1 MA, ME, NH, NS, NY, ON, QC, VT Tritominae Triplax dissimulator (Crotch) 2 2 4 1 1 MA, ME, NB, NH, NS, NY, ON, PE, QC Triplax flavicollis Lacordaire 1 1 NH, NS, NY, ON, QC, VT Triplax frosti Casey 1 1 1 MA, ME, NB, NH, NS, NY, ON, QC Triplax macra LeConte 1 1 MA, ME, NH, NS, ON, QC, RI Triplax thoracica Say 3 1 1 1 6 1 1 MA, ME, NB, NH, NS, NY, ON, PE, QC, RI, VT Tritoma pulchra Say 4 2 2 2 2 12 MA, ME, NH, NS, NY, ON, QC ENDOMYCHIDAEE Leiestinae Phymaphora pulchella New- 2 3 2 2 2 11 1 1 ME, NB, NH, NS, NY, man ON, PE, QC Rhanidea unicolor (Ziegler) 1 NB, NH, NY, ON, QC Endomychinae Endomychus biguttatus Say 1 1 2 4 2 CT, MA, ME, NB, NF, NH, NS, NY, ON, QC, RI, VT Stenotarsinae Danae testacea (Ziegler) 1 1 CT, MA, NH, NS, NY, ON, QC, RI Danascelinae Hadromychus chandleri 2 1 1 4 NH, NS, QC Bousquet & Leschen Lycoperdininae Lycoperdina ferruginea 1 1 CT, MA, NH, NS, NY, ON, LeConte QC, RI Mycetina perpulchra (Newman) 4 2 2 1 9 1 MA, ME, NB, NH, NS, ON, QC, RI Mycetaeinae Mycetaea subterranea (Fabri- 1 2 1 4 1 CT, MA, NF, NS, NY, ON, cius) † PE, QC, RI Total county records 19 7 11 9 14 60 8 4 Number of species 8 4 7 6 9 14 7 4 Note: Numbers indicate the number of county records in each province or region. For the purposes of this treatment, northeastern North America consists of the following jurisdictions: Connecticut (CT), Labrador (LB), Massachusetts (MA), Maine (ME), New Brunswick (NB), Newfoundland (NF), New Hampshire (NH), Nova Scotia (NS), New York (NY), Ontario (ON), Prince Edward Island (PE), Québec (QC), Rhode Island (RI), Saint-Pierre et Miquelon (PM), and Vermont (VT). Districts in Nova Scotia consist of the following counties: Northern Shore: Antigonish, Cumberland, Colchester, Pictou, Antigonish; Cape Breton: Cape Breton, Inverness, Richmond, Victoria; Eastern Shore: Guysborough, Halifax; South Shore: Lunenburg, Queens, Shelburne, Yarmouth; Bay of Fundy: Annapolis, Digby, Hants, Kings. There are 3 counties on Prince Edward Island and 15 counties in New Brunswick. Regional distributional information is derived from Campbell (1991a, 1991b), Downie & Arnett (1996), Chandler (2001), and Sikes (2004) as well as the present study.† Palearctic species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".