Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to a condition on the planning permission for development on land at St Margarets, Beacon Hill, Purfleet, Essex, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developer to undertake an archaeological evaluation of the site. The evaluation of the site has revealed a single archaeological feature of potential medieval date, which is likely to represent a field boundary or other land division. The low number of finds, and the condition of the pottery recovered, suggests that the ditch is located some distance from settlement or domestic habitation. The Purfleet area is know to have potential for Palaeolithic remains to survive amid extensive river terrace gravels deposited on the north side of the chalk ridge known as the Purfleet Anticline. After consultation with a specialist palaeo-archaeologist, Peter Allen, it was established that the site lies on the southern side of this ridge, away from the gravel deposits. On the basis of the data gained in the course of this evaluation, the risk that the development might encounter further archaeological remains of medieval date is High, but the significance of those remains is likely to be Low. The risk of encountering remains of any other period is Low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".