MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969201100 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6017660

Anthobium conjunctum Shavrin & Smetana 2017, sp.n.

2017· article· en· W6969201100 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead (geology)DebrisHolotypeTransverse planeBasal (medicine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3.3.2.3. Anthobium conjunctum sp.n. (Figs. 67, 76, 77–79) Type material examined: Holotype ♂ [plastic plate with aedeagus, abdominal tergite VIII, sternite VIII and apical segment in Canadian balsam was pinned under the plate with beetle]: ‘ CHINA: Yunnan [CH07-02 A], | Dali Bai Auton. Pref., Diancang Shan W | Dali, 25°41'20''N, 100°06'12''E | 3160 m, small creek valley, litter and | debris sifted, 28.V.2007, M. Schülke’ , ‘HOLOTYPE | Anthobium | conjunctum sp.n. | Shavrin A. & Smetana A. 2017’ (CSC). Paratypes (2 specimens): 2 ♂♂: ‘CHINA (Yunnan) | Dali Bai Auton. Pref., | Diancang Shan W Dali | 25°41'20''N/100°06'12''E | 3160 m (small creek valley, | litter and debris sifted | 27.V.2007 D.W.Wrase [02]’ , ‘PARATYPE | Anthobium | conjunctum sp.n. | Shavrin A. & Smetana A. 2017’ (1 ♂: CAS; 1 ♂: CSC). Description. Measurements (n=3): HW: 0.83–0.84, HL: 0.52–0.55; AL (holotype): 1.66; OL: 0.22–0.23; PL: 0.68–0.71; PW: 1.35–1.38; ESL: 1.63–1.66; EW: 1.93–1.99; AW: 1.65–1.81; MTbL (holotype): 0.91; MTrL (holotype): 0.42 (MTrL 1–4: 0.30; MTrL 5: 0.12); AedL: 1.01; TL: 3.90–4.20 (holotype: 4.15). Body moderately elongated, wide, distinctly convex. Body and antennomeres 4–11 reddish-brown; lateral and basal parts of pronotum and lateral sides of elytra yellow-brown; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–3 and legs yellow. Body glossy; anterior portion of head between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with traces of transverse microsculpture, posterio-lateral parts of head behind postocular ridges and neck with fine rugose sculpture; abdomen with distinct isodiametric microsculpture. Head with irregular sparse punctation, markedly denser and deeper on medio-basal portion; middle part of neck with deep and small punctation; pronotum with punctation as that on medio-basal portion of head, sparser and more irregular on medio-basal and latero-apical portions; scutellum with irregular small punctation; punctation of elytra as that in A. anishchenkoi sp.n. Body glabrous; clypeus with irregular long setation; frons and posterior portions of infraorbital ridges with very small setae, middle portion of head between middle length of eyes with a pair of elongated setae; anterior portions of middle elevation of pronotum with two pairs of elongated setae, latero-apical and lateral portions of pronotum with six to nine elongated setae very irregularly arranged; each elytron with very irregular and sparse setation indistinctly longitudinaly arranged. Habitus as in Fig. 67. Head 1.5 times as wide as long; middle portion of head slightly elevated or somewhat flattened, with indistinct medio-basal transverse impression; occipital furrow between ocelli moderately wide and deep; grooves in front of ocelli moderately short, reaching posterior third of length of eye; postocular ridges markedly acute, distance between postocular ridge and posterior margin of eye as long as two nearest facets; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with wide semicircular notch. Eyes and ocelli as in A. nigrum. Antenna with elongated antennomeres 3–8; measurements of antennomeres (holotype): 1: 0.18 × 0.07; 2: 0.13 × 0.05; 3: 0.16 × 0.05; 4–5: 0.15 × 0.05; 6–7: 0.16 × 0.06; 8: 0.15 × 0.06; 9–10: 0.12 × 0.07; 11: 0.18 × 0.07. Pronotum about twice as wide as long, 1.6 times as wide as head, widest in middle, more or less gradually narrowed posteriad and anteriad; anterior angles rounded, strongly protruded anteriad; posterior angles obtuse; latero-apical margins with irregular smoothed crenulation; disc of pronotum with very wide middle elevation with indistinct and irregular pair of transverse impressions in medio-basal third, or with moderately wide medio-basal impression uninterrupted in middle (one paratype); lateral portions wide and markedly explanate, each with deep pit at about middle. Elytra about 1.2 times as wide as long, reaching apical margin of abdominal tergite IV or basal margin of tergite V, more than twice as long as pronotum, with widely rounded shoulders, with widely rounded apical margins truncated at suture; lateral portions moderately wide, markedly explanated; latero-apical margins with small flattened crenulation. Male. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII straight. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII slightly sinuate. Aedeagus (Fig. 77) very narrow, with widely rounded apex of median lobe; parameres slightly exceeding apex of median lobe, with short apical and two preapical setae; internal sac very long. Aedeagus laterally as in Fig. 78. Female unknown. Comparative notes. Anthobium conjunctum sp.n. may be distinguished from all remaining species of the nigrum group by anterior angles of the pronotum markedly protruded anteriad, by the elytra markedly wider than long and by details of external and internal structure of the aedeagus. Distribution. The new species is known only from one locality (Fig. 76) in Diancang Shan in Yunnan, China. Bionomics. Specimens were sifted from litter and debris in a small creek valley at elevation 3160 m a.s.l. (localities: CH 07-02A (Fig. 81), 02) Etymology. The specific epithet is the Latin adjective conjunctus, - a, - um (connected, related). It confirms the belonging of this species to the nigrum group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207