MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969201727 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7875231

Diploneis limosa Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6969201727 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRapheApex (geometry)ExpansiveBent molecular geometryRegular polygon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diploneis limosa sp. nov. (LM Figs 582–608, SEM Figs 609–618) Valves are weakly asymmetric, linear-elliptic with parallel to weakly convex margins and round apices (Figs 582– 609). Valves become elliptic-circular with smaller cell size. Valve length is 12.5–33.5 μm and width is 9.5–14 μm. The axial area is very narrow, lanceolate, slightly expanding into a longitudinally elongate central area (Figs 584, 609, 610), 2.2–3.9 μm wide. Externally, the canal is linear to lanceolate, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with one row of cribrate (<20 poroids) areolae that widens into two along the raphe branches and then narrows into one at the valve apices (Figs 582–585, 609, 611). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Fig. 614). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved; the proximal ends are deflected to one side and positioned within an expanded teardrop depression (Figs 609, 610, 611). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side as the proximal ends and terminate on the upper mantle at the apex (Figs 609, 611, 613). Internally, the raphe is curved with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated within a depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Figs 614, 616–618). The striae are parallel at mid-valve changing to radiate towards the apices, 12–14 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate becoming biseriate towards the valve margins (Fig. 612). The striae are composed of round recessed areolae covered externally with fine pored cribra (15–40 poroids), 15–20 in 10 μm. The areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Figs 609, 611, 612). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Fig. 615). Type:— REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA, Lake Mweru Wantipa, at 934 m elevation; floating plant roots, 0.1 m water depth, 8°33’33.2” S 29°56’15.4” E, E. Jovanovska & Z. Levkov, 3 rd October 2021 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108974! = Fig. 583, isotypes ANSP-GC17203!, CANA-129327!). Type material CANA-129327. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103712 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S3r). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660298). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ limosa ’ refers to Lake Mweru Wantipa or ‘muddy lake’ where the species was originally discovered. Ecology and distribution:— This species has only been observed in Lake Mweru-Wantipa, where the pH is neutral (7.3), the conductivity is high (1114 μS̔ cm-1), and the transparency of the water is very low. This was the only Diploneis species we found in the samples from the lake, and it was extremely abundant. Main differential characters:— Valve size and shape, striae pattern, striae density, and poroids up to 40 per areola. Similar species:— Diploneis fontium and D. calcifuga. Phylogenetic relationships ML and BI phylogenetic analyses on the single rbc L and concatenated rbc L+18S datasets revealed a nearly congruent topological pattern (Figs 620, S 5). The concatenated dataset yielded higher support for basal nodes than those inferred from the single locus dataset in both phylogenies. The two phylogenetic analyses supported monophyly of East African taxa with two distinct and well-supported clades, of which one clade included species from Lake Tanganyika (BS = 94 %, BPP = 1 for rbc L; BS = 93 %, BPP = 0.99 for rbc L+18S) and Diploneis limosa from Lake Mweru Wantipa as sister with 95 % BS support for both rbc L and rbc L+18S (Fig. 620). Within the Tanganyika clade, two entities remained unidentified, listed herein as Diploneis sp. 1 and Diploneis sp. 2 (see Table S1). The second clade consists of two species from Mulungushi River (BS = 73 %, BPP = 0.99 for rbc L; BS = 81 %; BPP = 0.99 for rbc L+18S). Support values within the Tanganyika clade and clade relationships are low in both analyses, but especially so in the ML analysis (BS <69 %). Therefore, neither BI nor ML support the morphological grouping of species based on valve outline and striae pattern, possibly due to low genetic coverage or genetic variation in both, rbc L and 18S, markers. All lineages differ by 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site (overall mean p -distance) when assuming uniform rates for rbc L (Table S4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLichen and fungal ecology→French-language works237,207→