Hentzia fimbriata F.O. Pickard-Cambridge 1901
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hentzia fimbriata (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge 1901) Fig. 16 This species was adequately described by Richman (1989, pp. 306–307, figs. 37–43), but a few specimens have been collected in the United States, far north of the previously northernmost known record in Nayarit, Mexico. Based on the specimens examined it is possible that H. pima Richman 1989 is a junior synonym of H. fimbriata, as the photograph of the epigynum (Fig. 17) of a female collected from east of Sycamore Canyon resembles fig. 65 in Richman (1989), except for the openings, which in the Sycamore Canyon female are typical for H. fimbriata. The dorsal pattern of the abdomen of H. pima (Richman 1989, fig. 64) is very similar to that of the female from near Sycamore Canyon. The males collected in Sycamore Canyon and Florida Canyon closely match those of H. fimbriata. I suspect that H. pima is based on an slightly aberrant female, especially because of the relatively close geographical proximity of the type specimen from the Baboquivari Mountains. However, more material is needed either to verify H. pima as a separate species or to synonymize it with H. fimbriata. New Records. — USA: Arizona: 1 female, Santa Cruz County, Coronado National Forest, 3–6 km east of Sycamore Canyon in Pajarito Mountains (ca 31°20ʹ0 8ʺN, 111°0 8ʹ46ʺW, ca 1372 m), 29 July 1999, D.B. Richman (beating oak) (NMSU AM 832); 1 male, Sycamore Canyon, Hank and Yank Springs (ca 31°25ʹ39ʺN, 111°11ʹ33ʺW), 18 August 1992, W. Maddison, G.B.Edwards & M. McMahon (92-045); 1 male, Pima Co.: Santa Rita Mountains, Florida Canyon, Florida Station (ca 31° 46ʹ28ʺ N, 110 °52ʹ0 4ʺW), 13 April 1991, W. Maddison (91-014); 1 female, Pima Co., Santa Rita Mountains, Florida Canyon, Florida Station (ca 31° 46ʹ28ʺN, 110 °52ʹ0 4ʺW), 3 March 1994, female (presumably H. fimbriata, not identified) collected by W. Maddison (94-008) (last three records all in W. Maddison collection, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".