Claustropyga obtusidens Hippa, Vilkamaa & Mohrig
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Claustropyga obtusidens Hippa, Vilkamaa & Mohrig Fig. 5 A–D Claustropyga obtusidens Hippa, Vilkamaa & Mohrig, 2003: 501. New record: CANADA, Yukon Territory, North Fork Crossing, Mi. 43, Peel Plt. Rd, 3500’, 4.VII.1962, P. J. Skitsko, 1 male (CNC). Discussion. Claustropyga obtusidens was previously known only from the type material from Austria. The Canadian specimen is slightly different from the specimens from the type locality in the shape of the gonostylus and the tegmen. It is probable that the gonostylus of the Yukon specimen was slightly inflated in the KOH treatment and that the membraneous posterior part of the tegmen has collapsed. Among the Nearctic species, C. obtusidens is similar to C. auriculata from which it is distinguished e.g. by having all the gonostylar megasetae in the apical half of the gonostylus, and by having the patch of modified setae at the apex of fore tibia larger. In C. auriculata, these setae form a more compact group and rise from a roundish patch where the cuticle is distinctly different from the surrounding cuticle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".