MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969246487 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8064164

Aedes (Ochlerotatus) spencerii

2023· article· en· W6969246487 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesTheobaldAedesDorsumRange (aeronautics)HolotypeType locality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aedes (Ochlerotatus) spencerii (Theobald) subspecies idahoensis (Theobald, 1903a) —original combination: Grabhamia spencerii var. idahoensis (subspecific status by Nielsen & Rees 1959). Distribution: Canada, United States (continental) (Wilkerson et al. 2021). subspecies spencerii (Theobald, 1901c) —original combination: Culex spencerii. Distribution: Canada, Mexico, United States (continental) (Wilkerson et al. 2021). Aedes spencerii was described, originally as a species of Culex, from four adult females collected in Manitoba Province of Canada, two from Stony Mountain, the type locality based on lectotype selection by Belkin (1968), and two from St. Boniface (Theobald 1901c). Theobald provided a color illustration of the adult female in dorsal aspect (Theobald 1901a [plates]): fig. 104, pl. XXVI), which shows the pattern of dark tergal scaling typical of subspecies spencerii: “Abdomen covered with creamy and white scales, with large, black-scaled patches on each side of the middle line” (Theobald 1901c). Subspecies idahoensis was originally described as a variety of spencerii based on an unspecified number of females collected at Market Lake, Idaho, United States (Theobald 1903a); however, Townson (1990) reported the presence of two syntype females in the collection of the Natural History Museum, London. Theobald indicated that idahoensis only differed from the typical form in “abdominal ornamentation”, which he described as “Abdominal basal bands almost white, broad apical bands yellowish-white to white, very narrow, almost obliterated on some segments; the abdomen not pale at the sides, so that only broad basal and narrow apical pale areas are shown, the two apical segments are mostly pale scaled, and there are scattered pale scales on the others.” In contrast, idahoensis has traditionally been characterized as having dark-scaled abdominal terga with white transverse basal bands (see references listed below). Seven COI sequences for Ae. spencerii are registered in GenBank, three from Saskatchewan Province, Canada (KR444402, 596 bp; KR443924, 551 bp; and KR440309, 596 bp); two from Manitoba Province, Canada (KF535006, 658 bp and KF535007, 658 bp); one from Utah State, USA (JX260472, 213 bp); and one from Colorado, USA (JX259672, 658 bp). BLAST comparison of sequences revealed that two of the sequences from Saskatchewan (KR444402 and KR440309) and the sequence from Colorado (JX259672) are identical, and the 551 bp of the third sequence from Saskatchewan (KR443924) is 99.82% similar to the corresponding segments of those three sequences. Additionally, a 589-bp sequence from Saskatchewan identified as “ Aedes sp. BOLD-2016” is 98.13% similar. The sequence from Utah (JX260472, 213 bp) was too short to obtain a meaningful comparison, and the two sequences from Manitoba were apparently obtained from misidentified specimens: KF535006 is identical with 11 COI sequences of Ae. dorsalis and KF535007 is 99.39% similar to a COI sequence from Alberta (KP047935) identified as “ Culicidae sp. BOLD:AAD7982”. No DNA sequences are available for specimens identified as subspecies idahoensis. Ward (1984, 1992) and Wilkerson et al. (2021) were apparently not aware that Wood et al. (1979) had synonymized idahoensis with spencerii, with the following explanation: “The status of idahoensis has not been satisfactorily resolved. A few females in the Canadian National Collection have the characteristic abdominal pattern of idahoensis, but there are no males or larvae in the collection. According to Carpenter and LaCasse (1955), larvae of idahoensis have comb scales (13–29 instead of 7–13 in spencerii), and each scale has a less pronounced apical spine. Males of the two species were not separated. Nielsen and Rees (1959) found ‘almost every degree of variation’ between the typical female abdominal pattern of idahoensis and that of spencerii in Utah, Montana, and Wyoming. Furthermore, they cited three other authors who described similar variations in spencerii. They concluded that idahoensis was a more southerly subspecies of spencerii and that a zone of integration occurred in the three states previously mentioned. Until detailed biological or genetical studies resolve the status of idahoensis, we have no choice but to consider it a synonym of spencerii.” Darsie & Ward (1981, 2005) continued to recognize the two nominal forms as subspecies, stating in 1981: “Following Nielsen and Rees (338) [number of the article in the list of references cited] we recognize two subspecies under Ae. spencerii (Theobald), the typical subspecies which inhabits the central plains of North America, and subspecies idahoensis (Theobald), a more westerly and northwesterly form, also reported from southern British Columbia (135).” Based on published records, Darsie & Ward showed that the distributions of the two subspecies overlap in Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. They indicated that only idahoensis was known to occur in Colorado; thus, the COI sequence in GenBank (JX259672) of the specimen from Colorado identified as spencerii sensu stricto suggests that either both subspecies occur in the state or idahoensis is conspecific with the typical form that occurs in Canada. More specimens and study are needed to resolve this question. It is interesting to note that idahoensis, originally described as a variety of spencerii, has been regarded as a distinct species (Dyar & Knab 1908; Dyar 1917b; Dyar 1928; Edwards 1932a; Gjullin 1937; Rees 1943; Yamaguti & LaCasse 1951 d; Carpenter & LaCasse 1955), a synonym (Pratt 1956; Wood et al. 1979) and a subspecies (Nielsen & Rees 1959; Smith 1966; Myers 1967; Darsie & Ward 1981, 2005). In as much as idahoensis is apparently morphologically distinct in the adult and larval stages (Carpenter & LaCasse 1955; Darsie & Ward 1981, 2005) in areas southward and westward of an area of overlap or a zone of introgression with spencerii in Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming, we believe it is prudent to recognize it as a separate species, pending a comprehensive morphological and genetic analysis of specimens from throughout the distributions of the two forms: Aedes (Ochlerotatus) idahoensis (Theobald, 1903a). Aedes idahoensis is currently listed as a species in the Encyclopedia of Life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMosquito-borne diseases and control→French-language works237,207→