MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969246854 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7105656

Microphorella iota Colless 1964

2022· article· en· W6969246854 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Natural History
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeAllotypeType localityParatypeDorsumDome (geology)Phallus (fungus)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microphorella iota Colless (Figs 1, 47, 48) Microphorella iota Colless, 1964: 320. Type locality: Mt. Majura, ACT, Australia. Type material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂ labelled: “[AUSTRALIA] Mt. Majura [ca 35.2372°S 149.1822°E], A.C. T. [Australian Capital Territory]/ 2 Apr. 1963 / D.H. Colless. ”; “ ANIC 5873 / HOLOTYPE / Microphorella / iota. Colless. [red label]”; “ ANIC Database No./ 29 029403” (ANIC). ALLOTYPE ♀, same locality and date data as holotype (ANIC). PARATYPES: AUSTRALIA: A.C. T., Canberra, Mt. Majura, 29.ix.1960, D.H. Colless (1♂, ANIC); A.C. T. Ginninderra Falls [ca 35.1968°S 148.9617°E], 28.ii.1962, D.H. Colless (2♀, ANIC). Other material examined. AUSTRALIA: New South Wales, Colo Vale [ca 34.4017°S 150.4886°E], 17.i.1957, W.W, Wirth (5♀, USNM). Diagnosis. Males of M. iota are distinguished from the other known Australasian Microphorella by the following combination of features: body and legs blackish brown or blackish grey with black setation; palpus dark and narrowly ovate, dorsal surface with club-tipped processes (Colless 1964, fig. 1d); hypopygium (Figs 47, 48) with phallus relatively short, swollen along midlength, with tip bent back and brush-like; hypandrium large, distinctly wider than epandrial lamellae in lateral view. Distribution. In addition to the two localities in the Australian Capital Territory listed above, Colless (1964) recorded two female paratypes (in the Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia) from Sassafras Gully [ca 33.6992°S 150.5711°E], Springwood, in the Blue Mountains of New South Wales collected by D.K. McAlpine on 10.i.1956. We have also seen additional specimens from Colo Vale in New South Wales (Fig. 1). Remarks. Until this study, M. iota was the the only described species of Microphorella known from Australia. In their phylogenetic analysis of the Parathalassiinae, Cumming & Brooks (2019), determined that M. iota was not closely related to M. papuana from New Guinea or the two new Australian species of Microphorella described in this paper. Males of M. iota have club-tipped processes on the dorsal surface of the palpus, possess a unique phallus with a modified brush-like apex and have a large hypandrium. Colless (1964) states that specimens of M. iota were all collected by sweeping near streams. The females from Colo Vale differ slightly from the other known specimens by their blackish grey coloration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1350.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHistory of Science and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207