MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969251866 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8392869

Stenus pervilis Puthz 2012, nov.sp.

2012· article· en· W6969251866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusSpermathecaHolotypeApposition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stenus pervilis nov.sp. (Figs 8, 31, 58) Type material: Holotype () and 13, 4 - paratypes: Taiwan: Nantou Hsien: Nankaoshan trail, Yuenhai Hut, 2350m, 4.V.1992, A. Smetana (T 112). Paratypes: 38, 21: ibidem, 2000-2150m, 8.V.1992, idem (T 120).- HT and PTT in coll. Smetana (Ottawa), PTT also in cT and in cP. Description: About as in S. persubtilis nov.sp. Length: 2.4-3.0mm (forebody: 1.3-1.4mm). PM of the HT: HW: 27.5; DE: 14.5; PW: 20.3; PL: 21; EW: 25.5; EL: 20.5; SL: 16. Male: Ventral characters as in S. persubtilis. Aedeagus (fig. 31), apical portion of median lobe triangularly pointed, expulsion hooks connected medially; parameres with 8-9 apical setae. Female: Sternite 8 and Valvifer as in the compared species. Spermatheca (fig. 58), about as in S. persubtilis. In nearly all respects extremely similar to S. persubtilis, only the punctation on tergite7 is slightly finer and less dense, interstices often as large as punctures. Comparative notes: This new species is clearly distinct from S. persubtilis by the aedeagus. Etymology: Since this species is so closely resembling S. persubtilis I name it " pervilis " (Lat.= very cheap).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAerospace Engineering and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207