MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969255546 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7621500

Eugenia citroides Lundell, Contr. Univ.

2023· article· en· W6969255546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndangered speciesHabitatBiodiversityProtected areaAltitude (triangle)Montane ecologyHabitat destruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

19. Eugenia citroides Lundell, Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 7: 33 (1942) EOO: 4,738.708 km ². AOO: 44 km ². Evaluation of IUCN: Vulnerable. Eugenia citroides occurs in the state of Chiapas, Mexico (with 5 collection records), in addition to Guatemala and Honduras (Barrie 2020, WCSP 2020). The estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) fall into the thresholds of the Endangered category under the criterion B. Currently, there are 18 known records in areas of Humid Tropical Forest and the Humid Montane Forest, representing up to 7 known locations, considering occurrences within the protected area are outside or close to urban or farming areas. There is an inferred continuing decline in habitat quality from human activities especially on the eastern, which specimens are located outside the protected area. The habitat is mainly in a good state of conservation, considering that part of its records is from the very important protected area of Mexico, “Reserva de la Biosfera El Triunfo” (Rzedowski 1994, Rzedowski 1978, Ochoa-Gaona 1996, Miranda 1952, Breedlove 1981, Matuda 1950, Martínez-Meléndez et al. 2008, INE-SEMARNAP 1999b). The region between both countries where E. citroides occurs, which is the area of influx of Volcan de Tacana and the Volcan de Tajomulco, due to the physiographic characteristics of high altitude above 2,000 m elev., is very rich in biodiversity and endemism. Eugenia citroides is classified as Vulnerable (VU), as it meets the criteria B1ab(iii)+B2ab(iii). Specimens examined:— MEXICO. Chiapas: Breedlove 31783 (MEXU!). Guatemala: Williams et al. 23045 (F).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207