MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969257233 · doi:10.5284/1099378

Ilam Hall - Wood Lodge: Historic Building Record

2019· article· en· W6969257233 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsHeritage College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedEstateHistoric siteHistorical recordNational heritageArchitectureWorld heritage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report presents the results of a programme of historic building recording of Wood Lodge, Ilam Park, Staffordshire situated at National Grid Reference SK 13398 50601 (centred). The building lies on the southerly drive to the south-east of Ilam Hall, located on the southern side of the River Manifold and within the neighbouring parish of Blore. The overall recording strategy was designed to be compliant with a Level 2/3 (enhanced descriptive) record established by Historic England (2016). Wood Lodge represents a purpose-built lodge, dating to the late 1830s, and is considered to possess a national level of heritage significance on account of its high level of architectural interest as a largely unaltered example of Gothic Revival architecture, and potentially the only remaining example of the style, outside of the hall group, within the park. It also has a moderate level of historical interest as an estate building relating to the first phase of Ilam Park, and its association with an intended formal route into the estate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207