Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ooctonus vulgatus Haliday, 1833 Ooctonus vulgatus Haliday, 1833b: 344. Lectotype ♀ (NMID), designated by Hincks, 1952: 157. TL: Not given, most likely England or Ireland. Curtis, 1837: 134 (list) [P]; Walker, 1846: 50 (description) [P]; Marshall, 1873: 23 (catalogue) [P]; Lameere, 1907: 246 (habitat) [P]; Enock, 1914: 46 (list) [P]; Hellén, 1968: 34 (list) [P]; Bouček & Graham, 1978: 109 (checklist) [P]; Graham, 1979: 286 (distribution) [P]; Graham, 1982: 226 (discussion) [P]; Viggiani & Jesu, 1988: 1023 (incorrect host) [P]; Pagliano & Navone, 1995: 36 (list) [P]; Baquero & Jordana, 2002: 82 (distribution) [P]; Gijswijt, 2003: 50 (Netherlands list) [P]; Ulrich, 2005: 47, 198 (phenology) [P]; Pricop, 2008: 126 (list [P]; Pricop, 2009b: 126 (distribution) [P]; Pricop, 2009c: 22 (distribution) [P]; Triapitsyn, 2010: 14, 15 (key), 54 (synonyms, description, distribution); Nash & O’Connor, 2011: 90 (list) [P]; Huber 2012: 21 (key), 52 (description, host, distribution); Pintureau, 2012: 37 (list) [P]; Huber, 2013a: 11 (morphology); Bai et al., 2015: 26 (key), 34 (description) [P]; Triapitsyn, 2015a: 217 (correction to Haliday collection list) [P]; Dale-Skey, 2016: 245 (checklist) [P]; Koponen & Triapitsyn, 2016: 3 (distribution) [P]. Ooctonus americanus Girault, 1916 [264]: 69. Holotype ♀ (USNM). TL: USA, District of Columbia, Rock Creek Park. Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Girault, 1929 [428]: 21 (key); Whittaker, 1931: 192 (key); Peck, 1951: 410 (catalogue); Weaver & King, 1954: 17 (host, biology); Burks, 1958: 62 (correction to catalogue); Peck, 1963: 18 (catalogue); Burks, 1967: 213 (catalogue); Burks, 1979: 1027 (catalogue); Yoshimoto, 1990: 36 (list). Ooctonus auripes Whittaker, 1931: 190. Lectotype ♀ (NHMUK), designated by Huber, 2012: 53. TL: Canada, British Columbia, Chilliwack. Synonymy by Huber, 2012: 52. Whittaker, 1931: 192 (key); Peck, 1951: 410 (catalogue); Peck, 1963: 18 (catalogue); Burks, 1979: 1027 (catalogue); Yoshimoto, 1990: 36 (list); Triapitsyn, 2010: 54 (synonymy under O. notatus). Ooctonus acutiventris Soyka, 1949b: 37. Holotype ♀ (NHMW). TL: Austria, Hundsheim. Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Ooctonus askhamensis Hincks, 1952: 156. Holotype ♀ (MMUE). TL: UK, England, Askham Bog. Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Ooctonus collinus Soyka, 1949c: 47. Holotype ♀ (NHMW). TL: Austria, Spitzerberg near Hundsheim. Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Ooctonus niger Soyka, 1950c: 131. Holotype ♀ (NHMW). TL: Austria, Krössbach. Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Ooctonus stammeri Soyka, 1949d: 69. Holotype ♀ (NHMW). TL: Poland, Krkonoše Mountains. Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Ooctonus viennensis Soyka, 1949d: 70. Holotype ♀ (NHMW). TL: Austria, Vienna, Leopoldsberg. Holotype ♀ (NHMW). Synonymy by Triapitsyn, 2010: 54. Ooctonus wesmaeli Debauche, 1948: 122. Holotype ♀ (ISNB). TL: Belgium, Namur. Synonymy by Hincks, 1952: 157. Nearctic hosts. Cercopidae: Philaenus spumarius (L.). Distribution. Canada: AB, BC, NS, ON. USA: AR, KS, NJ, OH, PA, VA, WA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".