Land Adjacent to 40 Royal Oak Lane, Pirton, Herts. An Archaeological Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to investigate the archaeological potential of a proposed residential development site adjacent to 40 Royal Oak Lane, Pirton, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned to undertake a field evaluation by trial trenching. Seven trenches were excavated across the site, each covering 32m², representing a 5% sample of the 0.44ha site by area. Four of the trenches, located on the southern end, exposed linear features including a boundary ditch in Trenches 5 and 6 (shown on modern mapping), two small undated linears in Trenches 6 and 7, and two features of probable natural origin in Trenches 4 and 6. No archaeological features or deposits were revealed in the other three trenches and no finds were recovered. No evidence for any features or deposits pre-dating the post-medieval period was recorded; the post-medieval remains on the site are considered to be of negligible archaeological significance. On the basis of the results of the evaluation, the risk that the proposed development might have a negative impact on remains of archaeological significance may be considered to be Low for all periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".