MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969346524 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7503556

Quedius fuliginosus

2022· article· en· W6969346524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSAS software applications and methods
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubgenusSetaMargin (machine learning)LobeShot (pellet)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quedius fuliginosus -group Diagnosis. Head with 4 or 6 interocular punctures between anterior frontal punctures. Generally largest species within the subgenus with entire body dark; only rarely elytra reddish. Temporal puncture situated at posterior margin of eye. Paramere does not extend over median lobe apex, peg setae arranged in single rows; median lobe without large teeth on parameral side, at most with small teeth or subapical notch; internal sac without large c-shaped sclerite. Generally widespread species, common in the Palearctic region, found in diverse ground-based debris in both forest and open landscapes. Only Quedius afrofuliginosus is rare, possibly an artefact of both misidentifications and poor sampling in parts of its range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it