Voice of the People, Sondage fin d'année, 2003, [Canada]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'enquête Voice of the People sonde les opinions des Canadiens sur des questions essentiellement économiques, politiques et sociaux. Les questions portent sur l'état de l'économie il y a 10 ans, les prédictions sur la prochaine génération, l'état de la sécurité, les tendances des écoles publiques, les cliniques publiques et les hôpitaux. Il ya aussi des questions sur d'autres sujets d'intérêt tels que la démocratie canadienne, la politique et les élections. Les répondants ont également été regroupés en fonction des variables géographiques et sociales. Sujets d'intérêt: économie, sécurité, politique étrangère américaine; politique; prochaine génération; élections; les écoles publiques; les cliniques publiques et les hôpitaux et le bonheur général. Des variables démographiques de base sont également incluses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.037 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".