MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969348753 · doi:10.5683/sp3/qy5k4i

Aberdeen Pavilion (2022)

2022· dataset· en· W6969348753 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavilionArchitectureContext (archaeology)ExhibitionFraming (construction)Architectural styleStyle (visual arts)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Aberdeen Pavilion is a large-scale Victorian exhibition hall that was built in 1898 [1]. The brightly coloured structure is located in the heart of Lansdowne Park near the Rideau Canal. The structure is owned by the city of Ottawa and is managed by site custodian Leslie Collins and Lansdowne Park portfolio manager Benoit Osborne. The structure has historical and architectural value. The structure demonstrates the style and characteristics of Victorian architecture and is the sole remaining structure of its caliber in Canada. The structure also features advanced framing technology in its interior. The pavilion holds value in its historical context as it illustrates the importance of 19th-century agricultural fairs. Keeping in context with agricultural fairs, the Pavilion holds farmer's markets every Sunday at the current time. Attributes of the structure that further its heritage value include its late-Victorian architectural style which is seen throughout the exterior of the structure, its structurally inventive and lightweight skeleton located in its large open space interior, its large windows, which are arranged in long rows on every wall, allowing for the diffusion of natural lighting, its large domes, and the large facades which face north, south, east, and west, which feature biological ornamentation (vines, horses, and cattle). This is a dataset of information compiled for Courses CIVE3207 (ARCN4100), CIVE4601 (ARCN4200), CIVE 5603 Course on Advanced Building Characterization, Conservation and Rehabilitation, or any other for students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University. Students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University will use these data to produce a Heritage Recording Dossier of this important Site. This material can not be used for commercial purposes or use in any form without the permission of Dr. Mario Santana, the authors and site custodians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2310.161

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→