MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969352548 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7621458

Eugenia breedlovei Barrie, Novon

2023· article· en· W6969352548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndangered speciesThreatened speciesHabitatBiodiversityOccupancyBiodiversity conservation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10. * Eugenia breedlovei Barrie, Novon 15: 6 (2005) EOO: 354,456 km ². AOO: 12 km ². Evaluation of IUCN: Least Concern. Eugenia breedlovei is endemic to Mexico and known from only seven collections made in the state of Chiapas. The habitat is in a good state of conservation, mainly placed within a protected area very important for the biodiversity of Mexico, “Reserva de la Biosfera Selva el Ocote” (CONANP 2001, Rzedowski 1994, 1978, Ochoa-Gaona, 1996, Miranda 1952, Breedlove 1981, Matuda 1950). The estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) exceeds the threshold for a threatened category under criterion B, whilst the estimated area of occupancy (AOO) falls between Critically Endangered and Endangered categories. However, Eugenia breedlovei occurs within several protected areas and its area of occupancy (AOO) is considered underestimated due to its habitat specificity in the poorly surveyed Humid Montane Forest. As the last known collection was made 10 years ago, the low number of existing records is considered related to scarce collection efforts. Therefore, Eugenia breedlovei is classified here as Least Concern (LC). Specimen examined:— MEXICO. Chiapas: Miranda 6128 (MEXU!).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and BiogeographyFrench-language works237,207