MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969371466 · doi:10.5284/1100271

14-20 Chesil Street, Winchester, Hampshire; Historic Building Recording

2019· article· en· W6969371466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChromium effects and bioremediation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)CulminationPermissionRedevelopment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Rockliffe Williams Architects, on behalf of St John's Winchester Charity, to carry out a programme of historic building recording of 14-20 Chesil Street, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 0UH. Planning permission (Ref: 17/03096/FUL) has been granted by Winchester City Council to comprehensively redevelop the site to create 16 affordable, fully accessible, residential alms house apartments. All the existing dilapidated 20th century buildings that make up 14-20 Chesil Street will be demolished and the cellar beneath 16 Chesil Street will be backfilled. This record represents the culmination of 10 years of historic building recording at the site during which time four separate episodes of surveying have been conducted. The earliest recording of no.s 14 and 18 Chesil Street was carried out in February 2009, followed by two further surveys in January and May 2012 at a cellar identified below 16 Chesil Street and at the adjoining St Peter's Church. The most recent survey completed in September 2019. The various phases of survey work over the last 10 years has ensured that a comprehensive record of these early 20th century buildings and the post-medieval cellar below has been documented for future interest and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicChromium effects and bioremediationFrench-language works237,207