14-20 Chesil Street, Winchester, Hampshire; Historic Building Recording
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Rockliffe Williams Architects, on behalf of St John's Winchester Charity, to carry out a programme of historic building recording of 14-20 Chesil Street, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 0UH. Planning permission (Ref: 17/03096/FUL) has been granted by Winchester City Council to comprehensively redevelop the site to create 16 affordable, fully accessible, residential alms house apartments. All the existing dilapidated 20th century buildings that make up 14-20 Chesil Street will be demolished and the cellar beneath 16 Chesil Street will be backfilled. This record represents the culmination of 10 years of historic building recording at the site during which time four separate episodes of surveying have been conducted. The earliest recording of no.s 14 and 18 Chesil Street was carried out in February 2009, followed by two further surveys in January and May 2012 at a cellar identified below 16 Chesil Street and at the adjoining St Peter's Church. The most recent survey completed in September 2019. The various phases of survey work over the last 10 years has ensured that a comprehensive record of these early 20th century buildings and the post-medieval cellar below has been documented for future interest and research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.127 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".