MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969381113 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6595612

Cephalops klinsmanni Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6969381113 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCephalopods and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaPedicelScutellumApex (geometry)Phallus (fungus)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cephalops klinsmanni sp. nov. Figs 49–61, 107 Diagnosis. Male. Antenna with scape and pedicel brown, postpedicel dark brown, slightly acute. Frontal triangle with conspicuous dark brown callus. Coxae dark brown, trochanters light brown, tibiae dark brown, with bases and apices light brown. Abdomen ground color dark brown, tergite 1 sparsely velvety light brown pruinose, with four brown and long setae laterally; tergites 2–5 velvety dark brown anteriorly, brown pruinose posteriorly and laterally, with conspicuous setae. Surstyli subsymmetrical, slightly subequal to epandrium length, completely setose; thickened at base, thin apically, with tips slightly inward directed. Apex of phallic guide stout, long, thickened at base, acute apically. Phallus trifid, with ducts distinctly separated only in distal 1/3, only tips of ejaculatory ducts slightly coiled. Ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, with sinuous margins. Description. MALE (holotype). Body length 2.8 mm. Head (Figs 49–50). Eyes contiguous for 19 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.5, 0.5, 0.2. Frontal triangle black-brown pruinose, with conspicuous dark brown callus. Postcranium brown, ventrally gray pruinose, dorsally brown pruinose. Antenna (Fig. 51) with pedicel dark brown, with three setae dorsally and three longer setae ventrally; postpedicel dark brown, with acuminate apex. LPP/WPP = 2.7. Thorax (Figs 49–50, 52). Postpronotal lobe dark brown. Scutum dark brown, gray-brown pruinose. Notopleuron concolorous with scutum, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum brown, gray-brown pruinose, with few tiny setae scattered and 12 inconspicuous setae along posterior margin, two stouter. Mesopleuron and mediotergite brown, graybrown pruinose. Wing (Fig. 53). Length 6.4 mm. LW/MWW = 3.1; LTC/LFC = 1.6. Membrane brown infuscated; vein r-m located slightly after basal third of upper section of cell dm; anal lobe normal. Halter stem light brown, except base and apex dark brown, knob dark brown. Legs (Fig. 49). Coxae dark brown; trochanters light brown; femora brown, with apices light brown, with long setae ventrally and a row of long and fine yellow setae posterolaterally; tibiae dark brown, with bases and apices light brown; tarsomeres 1–4 light brown, 5 dark brown; pulvilli light brown. Abdomen (Figs 49–50, 54). Ground color velvety dark brown, tergite 1 sparsely light brown pruinose, with four brown and long setae laterally; tergites 2–5 dark brown anteriorly, brown pruinose posterior and laterally, with conspicuous setae; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 55. Syntergosternite 8 brown, brown pruinose, shorter than length of tergite 5, with membranous area apically (Figs 54, 56). Terminalia (Figs 55–61). Epandrium and surstyli dark brown (Fig. 56). Surstyli (Figs 56–58) subsymmetrical, slightly equal to epandrium length, completely setose; thickened at base, thin apically, with tips slightly inward-directed, left surstylus slightly shorter than right (Fig. 56); both surstyli with margins straight, tips forward directed when seen in lateral view (Figs 57–58). Gonopods subsymmetrical, right gonopod slightly thicker than left (Fig. 59). Apex of phallic guide stout, long, thickened at base, acute apically (Fig. 60). Ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, with sinuous margins (Fig. 61). Phallus trifid, with ducts distinctly separated only in distal 1/3, only tips slightly coiled (Fig. 60). FEMALE. Unknown. Type material. HOLOTYPE. Male: COLOMBIA, Caquetá, Vereda Las Brisas, 0145’14’’N/7544’51.5’’W, 2040 m [eters], 09–23. Nov [xi].2016, (1 ♂ LEUA –8677) (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerin, both pinned along with the specimen. Etymology. The new species is named after Klinsmann Steeven Ramos Vargas, the son of the first author. Specific epithet in genitive case. Geographical distribution. Colombia (Caquetá) (Fig. 107). Habitat. The specimens were collected in the cloudy forest of the eastern cordillera in the Colombian Andean Amazon region. Taxonomic notes. Cephalops klinsmanni sp. nov. runs to C. villifemoralis Hardy, 1954 in the couplet 14 of the key presented by Rafael (1990). It differs from C. villifemoralis in having postpedicel dark brown (versus postpedicel yellow in C. villifemoralis); all coxae dark brown (Fig. 49) (versus hind coxa light brown); both surstyli thickened at the base, thin apically, with tips slightly inward directed, left surstylus slightly shorter than right (Fig. 56) [versus both surstyli conical-shaped, with tips downward directed, left surstylus clearly shorter and thinner than right, figure 56 presented by Rafael (1990)]; ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, with sinuous margins (Fig. 61) [versus ejaculatory apodeme T-shaped, with margins somewhat straight, figure 58 presented by Rafael (1990)]; phallus trifid, with ducts distinctly separated only in distal 1/3, with tips of ejaculatory ducts slightly coiled (Fig. 60) [versus phallus trifid, with ducts completely separated, with tips of ejaculatory ducts no coiled, figure 57 presented by Rafael (1990)].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCephalopods and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→