MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969403887 · doi:10.5683/sp3/e7dcnf

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model and simulation results for the airflow and temperature profiles inside a weighing station of the road network for eleven different design scenarios

2025· dataset· en· W6969403887 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsSnowAirflowTruckTurbulenceFluentSlab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weighing stations of the road network consist of a pit, where the weighing equipment is located, and slabs at ground level on which the trucks are driven during the weighing process. Snow and ice accumulation on slab surfaces, as well as the freezing of the weighing equipment, could be detrimental to operations. Therefore, the pit of weighing stations needs to be heated during winter, which contributes to snow melting and the protection of weighing equipment. This results in significant energy consumption. This dataset contains: a) A readme file explaining the available data and how to use it; b) For 11 different cases, CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) models developed on ANSYS FLUENT R2 2023 (*.cas.h5 files). The 11 cases include a reference case, a validation case, and 9 other cases with alternative designs. The cases are described in the readme file and correspond to different designs of the system in terms of heater configuration and position, and gap size (airtightness); c) For the same 11 cases, simulation results reporting 3D profiles of temperature, velocity, pressure, turbulence quantities in the pit (*.dat.h5 files).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→