Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phaenobezzia fulvithorax (Malloch) Probezzia fulvithorax Malloch, 1915: 354 (male, female; USA, Illinois). Phaenobezzia fulvithorax (Malloch): Wirth & Grogan 1982: 185 (redescription; combination; distribution); Spinelli & Wirth 1986: 234 (Mexico record); Borkent & Wirth 1997: 135 (world catalog); Borkent & Spinelli 2000: 65 (new world catalog south of USA); Borkent & Dominiak 2020: 213 (world catalog). Diagnosis. The only species of Phaenobezzia with the following combination of characters: eyes broadly separated by the diameter of 5–6 ommatidia; antenna dark brown, flagellomere 13 bluntly rounded, not tapered distally; legs yellowish brown, hind femur and tibia with dark apices; ventral palisade setae sparse on tarsomere 1 of mid leg, dense on tarsomeres 1–2 on hind leg, tarsomeres 5 on all legs with 4 pairs of stout, sharp-pointed ventral spines. Male gonostylus about half as long as the gonocoxite. Material examined. MEXICO, Guerrero, Cocula, Apipilulco, sept-1995, light trap, 1 female CAIM [CAIM / Crt/lam-00265]. Morelos, San Rafael Vicente Aranda, 6-may-1983, light trap, 10 females, 7 males CAIM [CAIM / Crt/lam−00267−00284]. New records from Guerrero and Morelos. Distribution. British Columbia and Quebec (Canada), in USA from Washington, east to Michigan, south to California, east to Texas and Arkansas, Mexico (Baja California, Nuevo Leon, Morelos, Guerrero). Remarks. This species has a wide Nearctic distribution, included in Baja California, Mexico (Wirth & Grogan 1982). Spinelli & Wirth (1986) recorded this species from Nuevo Leon. We herein include new records from the Neotropical region of Mexico (Guerrero, Morelos).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".