MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969501559 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319517

Lasioglossum Curtis 1833

2023· article· en· W6969501559 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaKey (lock)AppendageOblique caseDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to Nearctic Lasioglossum groups with enlarged tegula 1. Head and mesosoma black to brown ................................................................................................ 2 – Head and mesosoma metallic golden, green, or blue ....................................................................... 3 2. Mesepisternum rugose .............................................. L. (Hemihalictus) kincaidii (Cockerell, 1898) – Mesepisternum imbricate ..................................... L. (Hemihalictus) glabriventre (Crawford, 1907) 3. Metasoma with no appressed tomentum in either sex (but with abundant simple setae); S2–S4 with long (2–4 OD), dense, scopa-like pubescence in males ..................................................................... ............................. L. (Dialictus) knereri Gibbs, 2010 (atypical forms only known from California) – Metasoma with some appressed tomentum at least on T2–T3 basolateral areas in females; S2–S4 with shorter (1–2 OD) and sparser pubescence in males, not scopa-like ......................................... 4 4. T1 with lateral tomentum (except in some males); clypeus projecting more than 50% below suborbital tangent; propodeum oblique carina absent in both sexes ................................................................... .......................................................................................... L. (Dialictus) perdifficile species complex – T1 without lateral tomentum in either sex; clypeus projecting about 50% below suborbital tangent; propodeum oblique carina present in females (but may be fine and difficult to distinguish from background surface sculpture) ........................................ L. (Dialictus) gemmatum species complex Key to females 1. Mesoscutum with appressed, fine, stubble-like setae less than 0.25 OD long, appearing shaved, and erect plumose setae about 1 OD long or less, these setae very sparse (each seta separated by about its length from the one nearest it, with some gaps about a seta’s length wide visible in lateral view) (Fig. 78A–B); mesoscutum golden-green to coppery, contrasting with blue to blue-green propodeum; size very small (ITS 0.67–0.77 mm); metasoma black .................................................................... 2 – Mesoscutum with appressed, fine setae 0.25–0.5 OD long and erect plumose setae about 1 OD long, these setae dense (each seta within its length from the one nearest it, with no gaps wider than half a seta’s length visible in lateral view) (Fig. 78C–D); mesoscutum usually concolourous with propodeum; size larger (ITS normally> 0.77 mm, except in L. gloriosum sp. nov., L. indagator sp. nov., and L. rufodeludens sp. nov., in which the metasoma is red-orange) ................................. 3 2. Tegula sparsely punctate (IS = 1–4 PD) at least laterally, not exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view, with inner posterior margin straight, coming to a blunt angle posteriorly (Fig. 79A); apical rims of T1–T3 minutely punctate (Fig. 80A) (deserts of southern United States and northern Mexico) .................................................................................................... L. perparvum (Ellis, 1914) – Tegula densely punctate (IS <1 PD), exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view by almost 1 OD, with inner posterior margin concave and a rounded projection reaching axilla posteriorly (Fig. 79B); apical rims of T1–T3 impunctate (Fig. 80B) (Neotropical Mexico, rarely occurring north to United States border) ................................................................................ L. magnitegula sp. nov. 3. Tegula impunctate except on extreme anterior margin (Fig. 81A) ................................................... 4 – Tegula with at least a few distinct punctures medially, usually many (Fig. 81B–C) ........................ 7 4. Tegula dark brown; mesoscutum coarsely punctate (punctation similar to mesepisternum) ............. ......................................................................................................................... L. profundum sp. nov. – Tegula yellow-orange; mesoscutum more finely punctate (punctures smaller than those of mesepisternum) ................................................................................................................................. 5 5. Mesoscutum and mesepisternum completely dull, tessellate to imbricate; metasoma entirely redorange (eastern Texas, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas) ................................ L. rufodeludens sp. nov. – Mesoscutum lateral and posterior margins and/ or mesepisternum shiny with at most weak microsculpture (rarely both dull); at least basal half of discs of metasomal terga reddish brown to black (apical areas may be red-orange or black) .............................................................................. 6 6. Postgena smooth and shiny (as in Fig. 82A) (Chihuahuan and Sonoran Deserts) ............................. ............................................................................................................................. L. deludens sp. nov. – Postgena dull, lineolate (as in Fig. 82B) (Florida Keys and Bahamas) .............................................. ................................................................................................. L. surianae (Mitchell, 1960) [in part] 7. Mesoscutum, preëpisternum, mesepisternum, and hypoepimeron margins fringed with appressed tomentum (Fig. 83A); metepisternum covered in dense tomentum obscuring the surface; metanotum median third covered in dense pubescence obscuring the surface (Fig. 83A); tegula and metasoma bright red-orange .............................................................................................................................. 8 – Mesoscutum and pleura without appressed tomentum (except sometimes mesoscutum anterolateral margins or metepisternum with sparse tomentum not obscuring the surface) (Fig. 83B); metanotum with dense pubescence limited to anterior margin (Fig. 83B); tegula and metasoma usually black to brown (if red-orange, then lacking the other characters) .................................................................. 9 8. Mesepisternum with most punctures separated by half a puncture diameter or less (IS <0.5 PD) (Fig. 84A); tegula outer margin densely punctate (IS ≤ 1 PD) (Nevada, Utah, and northern New Mexico) ............................................................................................................. L. gloriosum sp. nov. – Mesepisternum with most punctures separated by up to one puncture diameter or slightly more (IS ≤1 PD) (Fig. 84B); tegula outer margin sparsely punctate (IS = 1–3 PD) (southern Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas) ............................................................................................ L. indagator sp. nov. 9. T2–T3 usually each slightly convex with apical rim distinctly downcurved in lateral view (Fig. 85A); T3 usually with dense and complete subapical band of tomentum (Fig. 86A); disc of T2 with deep and dense punctures (IS ≤ 1 PD) reaching premarginal line and contrasting with largely impunctate apical rim (Fig. 86A) (Colorado to Veracruz) .......................................... L. coactus (Cresson, 1872) – T2–T3 each flat in lateral view and apical rim continuous with contour of disc (Fig. 85B); T3 without subapical band of tomentum or this band sparse and broadly interrupted medially (except in L. stictaspis and L. tegulariforme, in which the disc of T2 has finer and sparser punctures (IS = 1–3 PD) either becoming inconspicuous near premarginal line or extending onto apical rim) (Fig. 86B) ............ 10 10. Tegula relatively large (maximum length more than half ITS and reaching or exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), densely punctate throughout (IS <1 PD), and usually with inner posterior margin deeply concave, forming a broadly rounded posterior projection about the size of 0.5–1 lateral OD (Fig. 87A) (United States west of ~99° and Mexico) ......................................11 – Tegula relatively small (maximum length about half ITS or less and at most reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), more sparsely punctate medially (IS ≥ 1 PD), and with inner posterior margin straight or weakly concave, forming a sharp posterior angle or point smaller than 0.5 lateral OD (Fig. 87B) (if tegula larger or more densely punctate, then occurring in United States east of ~99°) .................................................................................................................................... 17 11. Metapostnotum smooth with fine, subparallel rugae and completely dull due to fine reticulate microsculpture (Fig. 88A) .............................................................................................................. 12 – Metapostnotum roughened with strong, usually anastomosing rugae (except usually subparallel in L. gaudiale) and shiny basally between rugae due to weak microsculpture (Fig. 88B) ................. 13 12. Face slightly longer on average (length/width ratio 0.8–0.85) (Fig. 89A); mesepisternum densely punctate (IS <1 PD) and usually shiny; mesoscutum uniformly dull due to strong tessellate microsculpture; in Nearctic region, T1–T2 apical rims distinctly punctate with no change in sculpture across premarginal line (impunctate in Neotropics) ................. L. pseudotegulare (Cockerell, 1896) – Face slightly shorter on average (length/width ratio 0.77–0.84) (Fig. 89B); mesepisternum usually dull or more sparsely punctate (with some IS ≥1 PD) and/or mesoscutum shiny at least on lateral and posterior margins; T1–T2 apical rims impunctate or punctures much sparser and finer than on discs ........................................................................................ L. stictaspis species complex [in part] 13. T1 disc with impunctate median line 1 OD wide or slightly le

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207