MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969503264 · doi:10.5683/sp2/hc5v47

Replication Data for: Variable flow directions measured at discrete depths in a bedrock aquifer using multi-borehole Active Distributed Temperature Sensing

2020· dataset· en· W6969503264 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeBedrockAquiferHydraulic headTemperature gradientTemperature measurementFlow (mathematics)Groundwater flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data collected at the Fractured Rock Observatory on the University of Guelph Campus in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Temperature data is from boreholes GDC-06, GDC-07, GDC-08, and GDC-09 sealed with a flexible and impermeable liner during two Active-Distributed Temperature Sensing (A-DTS) tests. The first test (Sealed) was collected with all boreholes on the site sealed with liners to restore natural gradient conditions. The second test was collected when an open borehole in the centre of the borehole cluster, GDC-05, was pumped at a constant rate of 54 L/min. All A-DTS tests included 30 minutes of background temperature before heating, which was subtracted from the dataset at each depth to show temperature differences above ambient. The composite fibre optic cable was heated for a 10 h period with a power output of 7.12 W/m. The DTS used to measure the temperature was a Silixa ULTIMA S (1.8 km model). The hydraulic gradient data were calculated form head profiles collected in three boreholes around the periphery of the borehole cluster: GDC-04, GDC-10, and GDC-12. These data were collected using a string of RBRsoloD and RBRduetT.D. transducers, sealed in place with a flexible impermeable liner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→