Rioneta uluguruensis Johnson 1975
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rioneta uluguruensis Johnson, 1975 (Figs 1, 2, 5–35) Diagnosis. Differs from R. inexpectata by markedly wider body (Figs 1, 2). Description. With the characters of the genus. Body length 1.10–1.13 mm (mean 1.12 mm, n=3), pronotal length 0.29–0.31 mm (mean 0.30 mm; n=3); pronotal width 0.58–0.62 (mean 0.60; n=3); ratio pronotal width/ length 1.93–1.98 (mean 1.96; n=3). Material studied. Holotype (dry mounted on card, female) in the collection of the Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren [MRAC]: “ Holotypus ” (printed on pink label); “ Tanzanie: Mts Uluguru/ Lukwangule Plateau/ alt. 2400–2600 m./ humus, 2–22/VII/71 ” (printed on white label); “Coll. Mus. Tervuren/ Mission Mts Uluguru/ L. Berger, N. Leleup/ J. Debecker V/ Viii/71 ” (printed on white label); “ Holotype female/ Rioneta / uluguruensis sp. n. / det. C. Johnson 1974” (written on white label). Paratype (dry mounted on card, male): similarly labelled. Additional material: 20 dry mounted, 10 mounted on Euparal microscope slides and about 100 stored in alcohol: “ Tanzania: Uluguru Mts., W slope between Tchenzema vil. and Lukwangule Plateau, H- 2200 m. Oct. 19–21, 2002, V. Grebennikov leg.” (MRAC, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes [CNC]).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".