Archaeological evaluation on land adjacent Red House Farm, Sudbury Road, Newton, Suffolk, CO10 0QH: September 2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five trial-trenches were laid out across the development site. The trenches were 30m long by 1.8m wide (totalling 54m�), providing a 5% sample of the site. An archaeological evaluation (five trial-trenches) was carried out on land adjacent to Red House Farm, Sudbury Road, Newton, Suffolk in advance of the construction of nine new dwellings with associated infrastructure. An evaluation on an adjacent site to the south in 2019 revealed a medieval pit, two post-medieval ditches/pits and a modern path along with several undated features. Thirty-one features were uncovered during this current evaluation: eight ditches, seven pits, five tree-throws, four natural features, two gullies, two pits/natural features, a pit/posthole, a pit/tree-throw and a tree-throw/natural feature. Sherds of Roman pottery from a ditch may indicate activity on the site in the Romano-British period. A ditch and a pit/tree-throw both contained medieval pottery sherds, with two other pits producing medieval/post-medieval and post-medieval dating evidence. A number of tree-throws on the site could be indicative of a period of tree-clearance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".