MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6973864537 · doi:10.58066/pyk1-wj43

Residence for AE Tulk, Esq., Shaughnessy Heights, Vancouver, B.C.

2023· other· en· W6973864537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorchAtticDoorsGround floorLaundryTerrace (agriculture)CliffBasementOrnaments

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plans, elevations, sections and details. Some drawings show changes and annotations in pencil. A detailed item list is available. Two-storey house with basement and attic joining an older and smaller existing building. The basement includes a heating chamber (furnace room?), fuel bins, laundry room, drying room, servant's room, wine store and two other storerooms. The ground floor comprises a vestibule with adjoining lavatory and cloak room, hall, drawing room, library, dining room, breakfast room, kitchen, pantry, larder, servant's hall and lavatory. A veranda off the drawing room leads out onto a large terrace which extends the full length of the south and west sides of the house. A porte cochere joins east side of the new house to the existing building and the ground level. he second floor is carried over the porte cochere making it a covered passage. The second floor consists of the upper hall, four bedrooms, boudoir, three bathrooms, linen closet, billiard room and two balconies. The attic contains four bedrooms, nursery, box room, linen closet and bathroom. The exterior walls are finished with stone and half timbering. Outbuildings include greenhouses, a stable, chicken house and a summer house.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7980.461

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)French-language works237,207