MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974066453 · doi:10.58079/s2or

Datenkurator statt Katalogverwalter

2006· article· de· W6974066453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2006
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Work (physics)Term (time)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Richard Akerman macht in seinem Weblog Science Library Pad auf die Thesen von Michael Ridley, Bibliotheksdirektor und (!) CIO der University of Guelph (Kanada), aufmerksam. Demnach ist der Bibliothekskatalog ein Auslaufmodell. Vom Katalog müsse man sich zu einem verwalteten digitalen Raum weiterentwickeln. Dieser bestehe aus nahtlos integrierten Diensten mit Community-Elementen, die von den Benutzern den eigenen Bedürfnissen entsprechend zusammengestellt und genutzt werden können. (Siehe Foli...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.059
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207