MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974106184 · doi:10.58066/smhx-9967

Milne, Wesley A.: my Air Force recollections (November 17, 2007)

2007· other· en· W6974106184 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrotherCrewTraining (meteorology)AlienTable (database)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Interview with Wesley A. Milne Interviewed by Louise Tumchewics November 17, 2007. Victoria, British Columbia When and where were you born? When and why did you join the RCAF? "I was born in Vancouver, August 7, 1923. I joined the air force October 20, 1942 because I was concerned that conscription might be enforced as it had been in 1916, and I would rather have been in the air force than the army. My brother was in the air force already. It was just the done thing, everyone was joining up. I had already left art school after 1 1/2 years of studying there, in order to work and I was working at the BC electric company." "My brother, Alien Milne, was in ground crew and later became an excellent pilot, flying mainly in coastal command. My brother was very mechanical, and always a wanted to fly. I am not mechanical at all, but I had very neat drawing skills and that singled me out for navigation because it was thought I would be good at chart-making. " Can you describe the training you received? "I was first sent to Manning depot at Edmonton. There was a bottleneck of aircrews at the navigation training centre in Calgary so I was sent to Saskatchewan, to the University at Saskatoon. The training consisted of classroom training in aerial navigation, learning to take starshots with sextants, that sort of thing. Then we went up in little aircraft (showed photographs of Avro Ansons) with two instructors. It was on to Brandon, Manitoba for further training on radars. I can't describe them--I'm not very mechanical. It was there that I graduated and was given an observer's badge one wing, with a "o" shaped ring." Pilots had two wings. From there I went to Lachine, Quebec, and then Montreal, where I made two very good friends through a Christian organization that helped Christian officers and airmen. I arrived in England maybe around D day and crewed up with one of these friends when we were sent to an OTU." You have many photographs of your crew. Can you tell me about them? How were you assigned? "I was the only commissioned officer on our crew for a while so I lived in a separate barracks until we were assigned to a squadron. Most of the crew was Canadian, our pilot he was a comic playboy, but an excellent pilot, had quick responses and was very cool, never panicked. The five carried on quite a bit, but my friend and I we didn't drink or fool around (because of religious beliefs) but even so we were all very close. We had great bond, we have all kept in touch and the others had reunions but! was busy in China and Taiwan so I didn't go to those gatherings, but I have kept in touch with all of them, although two have passed away now, but our wireless operator, Don, he is right here in Victoria and sometimes I talk to him." What aircraft did you fly on operations? "We started flying on a Wellington, that's what we were trained on then a Halifax, then half way through our tour we switched to a Lancaster. You know "remember remember the fifth of November" It's a Guy Fawkes Day expression, but for us it's something different because on the 5th of November, 1944 we were flying circuits and bumps--take-offs and landings--on the Halifax. One engine failed, then another, then a third. Our pilot was very good, he tried to maintain altitude but couldn't the plane kept dropping. The ground crew cleared the field, there were emergency crews waiting for us to crash. We all tucked into our crash positions, knees to forehead but I can't recall feeling afraid, excited and tense but not afraid. I really sensed that God was with me. Somehow we were able to make a safe landing and right away we were switched a new plane without a break so that the pilot and the rest of us would not lose our nerve. But the experience made us very close as a crew." What was your responsibility as a navigator during an operation? Please describe some of the trips that you flew on, if you can recall them. "We flew into the Norwegian fjords on mining raids. I recorded the altitude and plotted the route but the pilot flew by sight so I didn't have to do much! However it was quite challenging for the pilot because we were flying very low and there was a lot of flak. We were on the Chemnitz raid. This was done in cooperation with the Russians. It was strange weather that night, low base clouds and high clouds, we flew in between. We couldn't go in the high clouds because of the danger of icing. Out pilot had a sinus problem and was suffering from very bad headache. The pressure was so hard on him that he decided to climb to a higher altitude despite the orders not to. The ice collected along the edge of the wing and the airplane gave a great shudder and dropped. We were shouting at each other over the intercom. I as the navigator was quite useless. I simply sat and prayed for the crew, because I knew that they did not have the same faith, the same relationship with Christ as I did. I was very peaceful, I was not afraid to die, but I feared for the others. But we didn't crash, we didn't die." How did your experience in Bomber Command shape the rest of your life? "The Lord's protection on that mission and on all our missions strengthened my conviction to be a missionary. There were also many Christian officers they were far more evangelical than I. They also made a great impression on me. I knew before the war that I was to be a missionary and my time in the air force was confirmation of that because I survived in order to go into Christian service." Interview continued focusing on his 40 years as a missionary in China (1946-1949) and Taiwan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)French-language works237,207