Choc de contextes et complexification des savoirs en éducation plurilingue et interculturelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment s’éprouvent, se transforment, se transmettent les savoirs au cours des phases d’enquête, de production, de transposition, et de recontextualisation des connaissances dans le champ de l’éducation/formation interculturelle au sein d’équipes internationales ? Les intervenants réunis en Guadeloupe le 17 novembre 2021 seront centrés sur la comparaison des contenus de formation en lien avec la professionnalisation et l’interculturel à et par la recherche sur plusieurs terrains d’enquête : Guadeloupe, Martinique, Québec, Colombie, Nouvelle Calédonie… et les résultats, productions, préconisations et/ ou livrables qui en résultent. Les intervenants réunis à Paris le 24 novembre 2021 auront à cœur de présenter des dispositifs de formation et de recherche conjuguant des procédés artistiques, plurilittératiés et multimodaux dans la formation interculturelle des enseignants, et les résultats, productions, préconisations et/ou livrables qui en découlent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".