Regards croisés sur les transformations de la gestion et des organisations publiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les 15 et 16 novembre 2012 auront lieu, à l’ENAP du Québec (Canada), la IVème édition du Symposium International « Regards croisés sur les transformations de la gestion et des organisations publiques » et l’Atelier doctoral international (ADI) 2012. Ces deux évènements scientifiques seront consacrés à des présentations de travaux de recherche, t ables rondes, débats et échanges entre universitaires et praticiens des affaires publiques : L'atelier doctoral international (ADI) 2012, prévu pour le jeudi 15 novembre 2012 sera consacré à des recherches de pointes menées par des doctorants. Le symposium, prévu pour le vendredi 16 novembre 2012, sera entièrement consacré à des tables rondes avec des experts et professionnels, ainsi que des séances en plénières où des chercheurs œuvrant à l’échelle internationale présenteront leurs travaux et recommandations portant sur des sujets relevant de « La gestion des interfaces politico‐administratives revue à l’aune des indicateurs de performance publique». Les textes issus des meilleures communications au symposium seront proposés à la révision à la revue Politique et Management public (PMP) en vue de la parution d’un Dossier spécial « Gestion des interfaces politico‐administratives ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".