MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974299322 · doi:10.58079/azz0

Appel à communication: "Les malades et leurs proches. L’histoire de la santé au ras de l’expérience vécue de la maladie, de l’Antiquité à nos jours."

2018· article· fr· W6974299322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy and Social Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Context (archaeology)Component (thermodynamics)Relation (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colloque bisannuel du réseau de recherche Historiens de la santé 9 et 10 mai 2019 Montréal, UQAM L’histoire de la médecine ne fut longtemps que le récit glorieux de la vie des grands médecins, de leurs découvertes, de leurs théories et de leurs exploits. Il fallut attendre les dernières décennies du XXe siècle pour voir émerger une histoire de la santé qui ne se limite pas à être l’histoire des seules sciences médicales, de leurs héros et de leurs institutions. En 1974, Jacques Revel et Jean...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicPhilosophy and Social TheoryFrench-language works237,207