MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974304418 · doi:10.58079/vw76

AAC - Rencontres doctorales de l'Association pour la Promotion de l’Enseignement et de la Recherche en Aménagement et Urbanisme

2024· article· fr· W6974304418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHappeningPromotion (chess)Public workField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La quatorzième édition des Rencontres Doctorales en Urbanisme de l'APERAU Internationale se tiendra le mercredi 5 juin 2024 en bi-sites (Montréal au Canada et Tours en France). Les doctorant.es sont invité.e.s à proposer une communication. Ces propositions peuvent concerner l’ensemble des sujets de doctorat en aménagement et urbanisme ou de disciplines connexes ayant directement trait aux problématiques en aménagement et urbanisme. Les résumés seront à déposer sur la plateforme https://d...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it