MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974475157 · doi:10.5878/001618

Effects of a free sabbatical year - Respondents on sabbatical year

2013· dataset· en· W6974475157 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSwedish National Data Service · 2013
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Work & Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)Compensation (psychology)Higher educationPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 1 February 2002 until 31 December 2004, a free-year trial was conducted in twelve municipalities in Sweden. Employees could apply for a free sabbatical year (a period between 3 - 12 months), and still get 85% of the compensation they would have received if they were unemployed. Under the same time the person be replaced by an unemployed person that got a temporary employee. Purpose: The overall purpose of the study was to examine different aspects of health among individuals who were sabbatical leave, and among those who were substitutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSwedish National Data ServiceFrench-language works237,207