MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974475880 · doi:10.58079/pziy

Lloyd, Vincent & Viefhues-Bailey, Ludger (dir.), Dossier "Is the Postcolonial Postsecular ?", Critical Research on Religion, 2015, vol. 3, n°1

2015· article· en· W6974475880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicStudy and Philosophy of Religion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflexivityEthnographyAgency (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)Subject (documents)Field (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editorial How can mainstream approaches become more critical? Warren S Goldstein, Roland Boer, Rebekka King and Jonathan Boyarin Special issue : Is the Postcolonial Postsecular? Guest Editors: Vincent Lloyd and Ludger Viefhues-Bailey Introduction: Is the Postcolonial Postsecular? Vincent Lloyd and Ludger Viefhues-Bailey Articles : Postsecularism as colonialism by other means Eric Bugyis Fantasies of Sovereignty: Civic Secularism in Canada Pamela E Klassen Secular power, law and the politics o...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicStudy and Philosophy of ReligionFrench-language works237,207