MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974496731 · doi:10.58079/pjuc

Avis de parution: Christian Laval, Luca Paltrinieri et Ferhat Taylan (dir.), Marx et Foucault, Paris, La Découverte, novembre 2015

2015· article· fr· W6974496731 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMarxism and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Interpretation (philosophy)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)Meaning (existential)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HiSoPo vous informe de la parution de l'ouvrage collectif Marx & Foucault. Lectures, usages, confrontations, sous la direction de Christian Laval, Luca Paltrinieri et Ferhat Taylan, aux éditions La Découverte. Présentation Marx et Foucault : deux œuvres, deux pensées sans lesquelles on ne peut saisir le sens de notre présent. Pas de théorie critique qui puisse se passer de leurs concepts et de leurs analyses. Et pas de luttes qui ne renvoient à tel moment ou à tel aspect de leur héritage. Pou...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicMarxism and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207