Les conseils souverains créés par Louis XIV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peu de travaux ont été consacrés aux seuls conseils souverains, et notamment à leurs spécificités par rapport aux parlements. Le CHJ, qui s’intéresse de longue date aux cours souveraines d’Ancien Régime, a donc souhaité organiser une journée d’étude sur les conseils souverains créés sous le règne de Louis XIV : Conseil souverain de Martinique (1641), d’Alsace (1657), de Roussillon (1660), de Québec (1663), Guadeloupe (1664) et Tournai (1668). Il s’agira, à partir d’une réflexion sur les édits de création de ces cours, d’envisager les conditions de leur création, la manière dont leur organisation a été conçue (composition, attributions…) comme la manière dont elles ont réellement fonctionné. L’intervention de spécialistes de chacune des institutions créées par Louis XIV permettra de donner à cette journée sa dimension comparatiste en ouvrant un débat qui ne peut que s’avérer fructueux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".