MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6976338928 · doi:10.6069/9892-vr28

The Challenges of Cooperative Defense in NATO: North American and European Responses to the Russo-Ukraine War

2025· article· en· W6976338928 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Washington Libraries · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeopoliticsCold warNorth Atlantic TreatyTreatyWar on terrorAllianceSoft powerWorld War II

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2022 Russo-Ukraine War has plunged the world into geopolitical uncertainty that challenges the core beliefs and foundational principles of North American and European security strategies. As Russian tanks advanced into Ukraine, the ripple of aggression was felt far beyond the borders of Eastern Europe, shaking the very bedrock of the North American Treaty Organization (NATO). The war has reignited fears reminiscent of the Cold War and exposed the soft underbelly of NATO's strategic vulnerabilities and conflicting priorities among allies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Washington LibrariesSame topicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military StrategiesFrench-language works237,207