Narrow bandwidth perfect absorber based on composite hybrid plasmonics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) have shown unprecedented potential for miniaturizing photonic devices beyond the optical diffraction limit. However, their high intrinsic loss from metal material has been a major barrier to practical applications. One effective approach to reducing their effective loss is to engineer SPPs coupling by designing hybrid plasmonic waveguides (HPWs). In this work, we first theoretically calculate and analyze the coupling modes in a composite HPW (CHPW), demonstrating that the long-range and short-range supermodes in CHPW correspond to two different SPPs at two metal layer interfaces. Next, we propose and demonstrate a narrow bandwidth perfect absorber based on CHPW structure. The absorber's bandwidth is only 12.9 nm in the visible range and 6.67 nm in the near-infrared range. Our simulation results demonstrate that the CHPW's SPPs coupling mechanism can be extended to localized surface plasmons (LSPs) in the proposed perfect absorber, enabling a low-loss mode that contributes to the narrow bandwidth. This suggests that the CHPW configuration could facilitate the development of more advanced low-loss, high-performance plasmonic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".