The results of breeding work on naked spring barley
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent decades, the demand for naked barley grain on the market has increased, that is why the breeders of the leading institutions of the Russian Federation resumed breeding research to develop new naked barley varieties. In this regard, the purpose of the current study was to develop a breeding material for naked spring barley, adapted to the conditions of the Rostov region and, on its basis, new varieties. There have been developed the new naked barley variety with high productivity and grain quality, adapted to the conditions of the North Caucasus. The study was carried out in the scientific crop rotation of the department of barley breeding and seed production of the FSBSI Agricultural Research Center "Donskoy" (Zernograd) in 2014–2020. Based on the best local spring barley varieties ('Leon' and 'Shchedry') and naked varieties of the VIR collection ('Mancuria' (Sweden), 'NB-OWA' (Nepal), 'CDC-Dawn' (Canada), 'K-3780' (Tajikistan) and 'Golozerny' (RF)) there have been developed and studied the new naked barley lines. There was found that according to the trait 'plant height' the lines 'Leon x Golozerny' and 'Leon x Mancuria' belonged to the middle-height group (90.2 cm and 83.4 cm, respectively). The rest of the lines belonged to the tall group, their height varied from 96.5 cm to 100.3 cm. According to the trait 'earing date' there has been identified the line 'Leon x Golozerny' (24V), which is more early-ripening (5 days less than that of the standard). The same line turned out to be the only one that significantly exceeded the standard (the standard variety 'Ratnik' on 4.5 t/ha) according to productivity +0.3 t / ha, and taking into account the absence of hulls, this difference significantly increased to +0.7 t/ha. There was established that according to the trait '1000-grain weight', the lines 'Leon x Mancuria', 'Leon x CDC-Dawn', 'Leon x K-3780' and 'Leon x Golozerny' significantly exceeded the standard variety. The best indicators of grain quality were identified for the lines 'Leon x K-3780' and 'Leon x Golozerny'. The lines 'Leon x Mancuria' and 'Leon x Golozerny' were the most resistant to powdery mildew. The current paper has presented the characteristics of the new naked spring barley variety 'Zernogradsky 1717', which has a great productivity and a set of positive economically valuable traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".