MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6976532632 · doi:10.60692/msnmp-3av38

OutProFeed-Italy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Outcome Monitoring and Feedback Informed Psychotherapy

2024· article· en· W6976532632 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcome (game theory)Randomized controlled trialSession (web analytics)Protocol (science)Mental healthProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Routine outcome monitoring with immediate clinical feedback can improve the effectiveness of psychotherapy. This protocol study represents the first Italian randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of Feedback Informed Therapy (FIT) to improve patient mental health outcomes and processes. In it, we test a state-of-the-art digital platform (named Mindy) designed and developed for therapists that includes an integrated monitoring and support system. Methods: This longitudinal RCT (Zellen design) involves randomizing therapists and their patients who meet the inclusion criteria into three conditions. The first condition involves outcome and process monitoring (OPM). In this condition, patients complete outcome and process measures related to each psychotherapy session, therapists use the Mindy platform to monitor the outcome and process measures, but therapists do not receive feedback with clinical support tools. The second condition involves outcome and process monitoring plus feedback (OPM-F). In this condition patients complete outcome and process measures related to each session and therapists receive feedback on the Mindy platform's Clinical Support Tools based on the principles of feedback-informed therapy (FIT). Therapists in the OPM-F condition also receive monthly supervision/coaching for three months aimed at enhancing their use of the Clinical Support Tools. The third condition is treatment as usual (TAU) in which therapists and patients proceed with psychotherapy as they normally would, and therapists do not receive training. Therapists only use the Mindy platform as a streamlined digital record and to fill out the process evaluations at pre-treatment (after the first session) and the last study session (15th session) but without access to the data. In addition, therapists and patients in all conditions complete outcome questionnaires at pre-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up. Discussion: We expect that compared to the other conditions, patients treated by therapists in the OPM-F condition will experience greater reductions in symptoms, lower dropout rates, and a better therapeutic alliance. Therapists in the OPM-F condition will demonstrate better management of therapeutic alliance ruptures. Overall, the results of this study could encourage future decisions on the use of digital platforms (e.g., Mindy) and FIT. Study registration: April 10, 2024 [https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06356961]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207