MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6976655948 · doi:10.6068/dp1614320b5e765

TREND: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Factbook 2014: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics: Environment - Sulfur and Nitrogen Emissions | Country: Russia | Socioeconomic Indicator: Sulphur Oxides Emissions, 2006 - 2011. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 062-001-120

2018· other· en· W6976655948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcid rainSulfurSocioeconomic statusNitrogen oxidesSocioeconomic developmentAgricultureNitrogenNatural resource

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Factbook 2014: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics: Environment - Sulfur and Nitrogen Emissions | Country: Russia | Socioeconomic Indicator: Sulphur Oxides Emissions, 2006 - 2011. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 062-001-120 Dataset: Reports estimates of total emissions from human activities of sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides, by country. In the atmosphere, emissions of sulphur and nitrogen compounds are transformed into acidifying substances. When these substances reach the ground, acidification of soil, water and buildings arises. Soil acidification is one important factor causing forest damage; acidification of the aquatic environment may severely impair the life of plant and animal species. Nitrogen oxides also contribute to ground-level ozone formation and are responsible for eutrophication, reduction in water quality and species richness. High concentrations of Nitrogen oxides cause respiratory illnesses. This dataset provides indicators included in the OECD Factbook 2014: Economic, Environmental, and Social Statistics, updated annually by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Indicators, reported in 12 broad subject areas, cover a wide range of topics: agriculture, economic production, education, energy, environment, foreign aid, health, industry, information and communications, international trade, labor force, population, taxation, public expenditure, and research and development. Data are provided for all OECD member countries and Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and South Africa, where available. NOTE: The data presented here are copyrighted by OECD and reproduction is subject to OECD permissions policies: See http://www.oecd.org/rights for further information. Indicator descriptions are based on the OECD Factbook 2014. http://stats.oecd.org/BrandedView.aspx?oecd_bv_id=factbook-data-en&doi=data-00590-en Category: Natural Resources and Environment, International Relations and Trade Subject: Air Pollutants, Air Pollution Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Established in 1961, when 18 European countries plus the United States and Canada joined together to create an organization dedicated to global development, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) today includes 34 member countries from around the globe, ranging from North and South America to Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Member countries include many of the world’s advanced countries as well as emerging nations. The OECD mission remains the promotion of policies that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world. The OECD collects and analyzes data on a broad range of topics to help governments foster prosperity and fight poverty through economic growth and financial stability, at the same time taking the environmental implications of economic and social development into account. The OECD Secretariat collects and analyzes data, after which committees discuss policy regarding this information, the Council makes decisions, and then governments implement recommendations. The performance of individual countries is monitored following implementation via a system of multilateral surveillance and a peer review process. The OECD is headquartered in Paris, France, and it is funded by its member countries. National contributions are based on a formula that takes account of the size of each member's economy. The largest contributor is the United States, which provides nearly 24% of the budget, followed by Japan. http://www.oecd.org/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.027
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.112

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Planet→French-language works237,207→