Study of heavy-flavor quarks produced in association with top-quark pairs ats=7 TeVusing the ATLAS detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a sample of dilepton top-quark pair ($t\overline{t}$) candidate events, a study is performed of the production of top-quark pairs together with heavy-flavor (HF) quarks, the sum of $t\overline{t}+b+X$ and $t\overline{t}+c+X$, collectively referred to as $t\overline{t}\text{ }+\text{ }\mathrm{HF}$. The data set used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of $4.7\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The presence of additional HF ($b$ or $c$) quarks in the $t\overline{t}$ sample is inferred by looking for events with at least three $b$-tagged jets, where two are attributed to the $b$ quarks from the $t\overline{t}$ decays and the third to additional HF production. The dominant background to $t\overline{t}\text{ }+\text{ }\mathrm{HF}$ in this sample is $t\overline{t}+\text{jet}$ events in which a light-flavor jet is misidentified as a heavy-flavor jet. To determine the heavy- and light-flavor content of the additional $b$-tagged jets, a fit to the vertex mass distribution of $b$-tagged jets in the sample is performed. The result of the fit shows that $79\text{ }\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\text{ }14\text{ }(\text{stat})\text{ }\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\text{ }22\text{ }(\text{syst})$ of the 105 selected extra $b$-tagged jets originate from HF quarks, 3 standard deviations away from the hypothesis of zero $t\overline{t}\text{ }+\text{ }\mathrm{HF}$ production. The result for extra HF production is quoted as a ratio (${R}_{\mathrm{HF}}$) of the cross section for $t\overline{t}\text{ }+\text{ }\mathrm{HF}$ production to the cross section for $t\overline{t}$ production with at least one additional jet. Both cross sections are measured in a fiducial kinematic region within the ATLAS acceptance. ${R}_{\mathrm{HF}}$ is measured to be $[6.2\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.1(\text{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.8(\text{syst})]%$ for jets with ${p}_{T}>25\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ and $|\ensuremath{\eta}|<2.5$, in agreement with the expectations from Monte Carlo generators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".