MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6976848202 · doi:10.60692/pyxj0-y4z30

Precise Automation and Analysis of Environmental Factor Effecting on Growth of St. John's Wort

2019· article· en· W6976848202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomationGreenhouseControl (management)Environmental dataThe InternetAutomatic controlWeb applicationEnvironmental monitoring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal of this study was to enable cultivating St. John's wort not only in Europe and West Asia, but also in Thailand, Southeast Asia despite warmer climate than in the natural growth regions. The challenge then was to control environmental factors with an automatic system. The Internet of Things (IoT) was applied in the sensor devices to control and collect relevant environmental data from the designed greenhouse. Moreover, data analysis by multiple linear regression was applied to enable the control of the designed greenhouse environment. It was used to discover interesting relationships between variables. The proposed system was implemented with hardware, a web application, and a mobile application. The hardware was designed to collect data and implement control of air temperature, air relative humidity, soil moisture, and light from sensors in the field. The web and mobile applications were developed to manipulate the obtained data, for intelligent control, and for real-time monitoring of environmental factors. The control system included an evaporative cooling system, fogging system, irrigation system, and artificial light system. The results show that the proposed system to assist and support the growth of St. John's wort was successful. Moreover, the results from this research can be used to culture St. John's wort, in order to produce medicines that are beneficial to human health in regions with the tropical climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207