MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6976876457 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.162.v1

Change in size as a function of Mw for CMS

2011· other· en· W6976876457 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunction (biology)Degree (music)Range (aeronautics)PolymerCharacterization (materials science)Variation (astronomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure 4-3 is a plot of R, as a function of the rnolecular weight of CMC obtained from Debye plots. Sizes range from 100 - 185 run for 5.00 x 1 O" and 5.99 x IO' molecular weight polymers. The relationship between the variation of R, and M,. is not clear except for polymers a and a', which have the same degree of substitution. This figure is taken from the thesis 'In-vitro and in-vivo characterization of carboxymethylchitin-coated liposomes' which can be found online here: http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/thesescanada/vol1/QMM/TC-QMM-42098.pdf http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca:8881/thesisfile42098.pdf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesFrench-language works237,207