MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6976926091 · doi:10.6068/dp152cca8701464

RANKING: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Gender Statistics [Archive]: Time Use by Activity | Selection 1: Sleep | Selection 2: Both sexes, 2006. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 054-003-066

2016· other· en· W6976926091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionOfficial statisticsTime-use surveySelection (genetic algorithm)Data collectionNational accountsBaseline (sea)Per capitaEconomic data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Gender Statistics [Archive]: Time Use by Activity | Selection 1: Sleep | Selection 2: Both sexes, 2006. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 054-003-066 Dataset: Shows survey data on average amount of time spent on specific activities each day, by sex. The Gender Statistics database presents sex-disaggregated social data for the 56 member states of the United National Economic Commission on Europe (UNECE) region, which include the countries of Europe, but also Canada, the United States, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Israel. The data covers the Common Gender Indicators for the UNECE region as well as the data series that are used to calculate these indicators. The data have been supplied by national statistical offices through the network of Gender Statistics Focal Points, and are compiled by the Statistical Division of the UNECE Secretariat from different official national and international sources. Data available varies by country. NOTE: Data-Planet discontinued updating of this dataset in 2011 due to irregularities in the data structure. For more recent data on similar topics, please see the Eurostat database. http://w3.unece.org/pxweb/Dialog/ Time use represents the average time spent (hours and minutes) on an activity per day. All days of the week, as well as working and holiday periods are included. Data refer to employed, unemployed and economically inactive people aged 20-74. Gainful work: includes time spent on main and second jobs (including informal employment) and related activities, breaks and travel during working hours, and on job seeking. Study: includes time spent on study at school and during free time. Domestic work includes housework, child and adult care, gardening and pet care, construction and repairs, shopping and services, and household management. Travel includes commuting and trips connected with all kinds of activities, except travel during working hours. Sleep includes sleep during night or daytime, waiting for sleep, naps, as well as passive lying in bed because of sickness. Meals includes meals, snacks and drinks. Personal care includes dressing, personal hygine, making up, shaving, sexual activities and personal health care. Free time includes all other kinds of activities, e.g, volunteer work and meetings, helping other households, socializing and entertainment, sports and outdoor activities, hobbies and games, reading, watching TV, resting or doing nothing. Category: Population and Income Subject: Time Utilization, Gender Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) was established in 1947 as one of the five regional economic commissions of the United Nations. Its major aim is to promote pan-European economic integration. To do so, UNECE brings together 56 countries located in the European Union, non-EU Western and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and North America. All these countries dialogue and cooperate under the aegis of the UNECE on economic and sectoral issues. http://www.unece.org/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.023
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.142

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Planet→French-language works237,207→