Additional file 1 of Predicting extubation in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury using the diaphragm electrical activity during a single maximal maneuver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Table S1. Clinical characteristics of included patients. Table S2. Comparisons of baseline EAdi and ΔEAdi and ΔVT among patients with different ASIA impairment scales. Table S3. Comparisons between patients with or without corresponding sensory impairment. Table S4. Multivariable logistics regression exploring the association between ΔEAdi and extubation success. Table S5. Predictive performance of possible predictors for extubation success. Figure S1. ROC curve analysis of selected variables for predicting extubation success. (A) ΔEAdi; (B) Rapid shallow breathing index; (C) baseline tidal volume; (D) Δ tidal volume; (E) baseline NVE; (F) maximal NVE. Figure S2. Decision curve analysis demonstrated the net benefit associated with the use of ΔEAdi over (A) rapid shallow breathing index; (B) baseline tidal volume; (C) ΔVT; (D) baseline NVE; (E) maximal NVE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.780 | 0.071 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".