Interactions between medications and the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: meta data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comma delimited metadata file with 1047 observations. Medication data are encoded with the highest ATC classifiction available. Location :geographic location of participant, Irish or Canadian Age_in_years : Age of participant at the time of samplecollection in years, numeric Sex : Biological sex, male or female Alcohol : Alcohol consumption, 1=more than 2 units/day, 2=less than 2 units/day, 3=none Smoking : Smoking status; 1=never,2=ex,3=current IBD_Subtype : IBD diagnosis; Ulcerative colitic (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) Disease_Activity :active is defined as fecal ccalprotectin of ≥250 µg/g; active or inactive HFD_Index :Healthy food diversity index; numeric Years_since diagnosis, numeric Resection : Surgical resection of ileum or colon, 1:yes, 0:no Number_of_Supplements, numeric Number_of_Medications , numeric unknown: pharmacological substance could not be determined other_supplement:supplement had no ATC classifier probiotic; supplement contains probiotic bacteria
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.079 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".